Reinvent Democracy by Creating Three Dimensional 3D Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Syria’

The History of the Jewish Khazars

The History of the Jewish Khazars, book written by D. M. Dunlop.

The History of the Jewish Khazars, book written by D. M. Dunlop.

The History of the Jewish Khazars, book written by D. M. Dunlop.
published in 1967, Princeton University Press. 292 pp.

Judaized Turks

For the sober historian speculation about what might have been is a frivolous distraction, but for those of us with less responsibility it has its charms. What would have happened if Xerxes’ invasion had been successful, or if Charles Martel had not driven the Moslems back behind the Pyrenees, or if the Russians had adopted the Christianity of Rome rather than of Byzantium? With these questions we are familiar. We are less familiar with the questions that the Khazars suggest. What would have happened if the Khazars had not kept the Moslems from breaking out north of the Caucasus, or if they had been able to maintain their state, or if their kin the Turks, Bulgars, and Magyars and their neighbors the Russians had followed the example of their rulers and aristocracy and adopted Judaism?

These are idle questions, of course, but they are not fantastic. The Khazars were not a myth invented by Judah ha-Levi in the 12th century as a convenient narrative vehicle for his theology. They are not even an invention of the Arab League, which would have it that modern Jews are descended from them rather than from Palestinian ancestors; or of American anti-Semites, of whom some now refer to “Khazars” as they once referred to “Eskimos,” for coy concealment, and others try to invest the name with an uncanny and sinister quality. From the 7th century until some hundreds of years later the Khazars were a power where Asia Minor meets Europe. Mr. Dunlop, citing Constantine Porphyrogenitus, reminds us that in the 10th century letters to their ruler from the Byzantine court, for which ceremony was no trivial matter, “bore a more handsome gold seal than that judged necessary for correspondence with the Pope of Rome or the successor of Charlemagne.” Khazar princesses were wives and mothers of emperors in Constantinople, and more than one Caesar of the Eastern Roman empire was enthroned with Khazar support. The Khazars ruled in the area more or less clearly defined on the west, south, and east by the Black Sea, the Caucasus Mountains, and the Caspian Sea, and vaguely on the north by the Volga and Don Rivers. It was they who defeated the repeated attempts of Islam at its most virile and expansive to push into Eastern Europe. Poor as our reliable information about them is, we can be sure of their importance before the destruction of their state, probably in the second half of the 10th century, by the Russians, or at the latest in the 13th century by the Mongols.

(more…)

Damage Assessment of Israel’s ‘Clean Break’ Plan

Damage Assessment of Israel’s 'Clean Break' Plan

Damage Assessment of Israel’s ‘Clean Break’ Plan

Neocon Middle East Policy: The ‘Clean Break’ Plan Damage Assessment” is a 112 pages book, Written by Adam Shapiro and E. Faye Williams ; Published by : Institute for Research Middle Eastern Policy, Inc. (IRmep) (March 1, 2005)

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm is a definitive Middle East strategy authored and implemented by operatives in the highest levels of the US government. There is just one problem. The plan was a strategy for Israel, not the United States of America.

The book reviews strategies and consequences of the “Clean Break” plan authored by Richard Perle, David Wurmser, and Douglas Feith in 1996. It analyzes the core assumptions of the policy, cost of tactics that have already been implemented and discusses the likelihood others will be executed in the future.

Neocon Middle East Policy then turns to the most difficult questions of all, “Can a policy crafted for a foreign government and presented to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu serve as a blueprint for US regional policy? At what cost in credibility, blood, treasure and American integrity? At what cost to Israel?” Neocon Middle East Policy is a must-read for anyone concerned about the convergence of US and Israeli foreign policy in the Middle East.
Contributors: Adam Shapiro, Dr. E. Faye Williams, Khaled Dawoud, Mohammed Kaddam. Edited by Grant F. Smith, Publication Date: April, 2005 ISBN # 0-9764437-3-2 Cover Price $9.95 Shipping Weight 9 Ounces, Paperback: 112 pages, Publisher: Institute for Research (March 1, 2005), ISBN-10: 0976443732, ISBN-13: 978-0976443735

IT SAYS:
The Israeli policy paper “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” (ACB) Policy Initiatives (Source: Institute for Research Middle Eastern Policy, IRMEP 2003)
Increase U.S. Congressional Support
1. “Electrify and find support” of key U.S. congressional members
2. Strategic cooperation with U.S. on missile defense
3. Gain more support among members of Congress with little knowledge of Israel
4. Harness support to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv
5. Identify Israel with the U.S. and “western values”
6. Utilize Cold War rhetoric to make Israel’s case to the American people
“Peace for Peace” Palestinian Solution
1. Eliminate movements toward a “comprehensive peace” and substitute with the “Peace for Peace” strategy
2. Stress “balance of power” as sole test of legitimacy, enforce agreements
3. Nurture alternatives to Arafat
4. Seek legitimization of “hot pursuit” of Palestinian militants
5. Eliminate “land for peace” concept, use negotiations only as a forum for communicating resolve
6. Establish a joint monitoring committee with the U.S. for measuring Palestinian compliance
7. Withhold U.S. aid to Palestinians
8. Promote Human Rights among Arabs to isolate Palestinians in Arab Constituencies
9. Legitimize 2000 year old historical land claim
10. Foment Arab recognition of Israel in exchange for peace
Contain, Destabilize, and Roll Back Regional Challengers
1. Challenge Arab countries as “police states” lacking in legitimacy.
2. Fortify regional alliances. Work with Turkey and Jordan to insert hostile Arab tribes into Syria
Syria
1. Publicly question Syrian legitimacy, assume treaties with Damascus are in bad faith
2. Contain Syria, strike select targets
3. Reject “land for peace” concept on the Golan Heights
Iraq
1. Install a Hashemite monarchy in Iraq
2. Isolate and surround Syria with a friendly regime in Iraq
Lebanon
1. Engage Syria, Iran and Iraq in Lebanon
2. “Wean” Lebanese Shiites from Iraq toward Jordan
Economic Reform
1. Eliminate Social Zionism from the economy.
2. Reform the overall economy, cut taxes
3. Show maturity and economic self reliance from the United States
4. Eliminate need for defense by U.S. military forces
5. Remove U.S. aid leverage over Israel
6. Relegislate a free trade zone, sell off public lands and enterprises
Zionism
1. Rebuild Zionism, rejuvenate the national ideal
2. “Shape the regional environment” in favor of Israel, “transcend foes” rather than contain them
3. Pre-emption as the preferred national defense strategy
Although ACB readers can identify nearly 34 distinct and actionable goals eloquently stated within the document, they may be summarized in five overarching policy goals:
1. Increase U.S. Congressional Support
2. “Peace for Peace” Palestinian Strategy
3. Contain, Destabilize, and Roll Back Regional Challengers
4. Economic Reform
5. Rejuvenation of Zionism

In this paper, we evaluate the level of implementation of these five summary goals, and their effect on the interests of the United States. However, no set of policies ever come to fruition without an active and vocal distribution and implementation network. ACB’s legions of American shock troops are many. At its core, key operatives working within the Bush Administration (called the Neocons), policy research “think tanks”, specialty press, and opinion columns have achieved amazing success at seasoning and baking ACB policy agenda items into a tenuous mold as “vital interests” of the United States itself.
The need for “crime scene” levels of evidence linking ACB followers’ complicity in the actions of the U.S. Government at Israel’s behest is unnecessary. Many U.S. actions are simply so inexplicable that consideration of their chief benefactor, Israel, is the only reasonable explanation. And as Americans dismiss Arab government charges that Israel is attacking them by proxy across the region, the evidence shows that the Arabs are correct. “A Clean Break” is, at heart, an Israeli proclamation of “Dirty War”.

Read the full Executive Summary of Institute for Research Middle Eastern Policy, Inc., on The Israeli policy paper “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” (ACB) at this link

Jihadists Are Policy Tool of Israel, Jordan and Turkey

The US, Turkey, Israel “Triple Alliance”

The US, Turkey, Israel “Triple Alliance”

The civil war by ISIS in Syria and Iraq is a joint planned project between Israel; Turkey and Jordan, called “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm“.

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (commonly known as the “Clean Break” report) is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel. The report explained a new approach to solving Israel’s security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on “Western values.” It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting its possession of “weapons of mass destruction”. The polices set forth in the paper were rejected by Netanyahu.

“A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” states the following:
[To secure the nation’s streets and borders in the immediate future, Israel can:
Work closely with Turkey and Jordan to contain, destabilize, and roll-back some of its most dangerous threats. This implies clean break from the slogan, “comprehensive peace” to a traditional concept of strategy based on balance of power.

Change the nature of its relations with the Palestinians, including upholding the right of hot pursuit for self-defense into all Palestinian areas and nurturing alternatives to Arafat’s exclusive grip on Palestinian society.
Forge a new basis for relations with the United States—stressing self-reliance, maturity, strategic cooperation on areas of mutual concern, and furthering values inherent to the West. This can only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which prevents economic reform.

This report is written with key passages of a possible speech marked TEXT that highlight the clean break which the new government has an opportunity to make.]
To download a pdf copy of the “Clean Break” full report click on here

Or read it on Wikipedia at this link

Turkey is After Turkic Domination and NOT Islam or EU

Turkey is After Turkic Domination

Turkey is After Turkic Domination

The State known as Turkey was established only in 1923 and the original name of that land was Anatolia.
Turks are nomadic tribes and they arrived from Central Asia, to west of the Caspian Sea. Turkey is not their homeland but they named their new settlement Turkey on their tribal group. The original native population of Anatolia were and are persecuted and a lot of injustice is still inflicted on them despite that Anatolia is their historic home and they created civilizations.

Turkey uses its location and the interests of Western countries and their false claim of leadership in Islam to support terrorism. Their real objective is to strengthen the influence and wealth of Turkic tribes inside Turkey and in the neighboring countries in the region.

Turkey has become increasingly integrated with the West through membership in organizations such as the Council of Europe and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Turkey began full membership negotiations with the European Union in 2005,

The real interests and policies of Turkey are not about Islam nor about Western values and their ways of life; but they only aim to achieve hegemony and domination on the region by Turkic tribes and maintain strong control over other groups inside Anatolia.

Terrorism of Turks Gog and Magog

Atlas of the Bible Magog in Turkey

Atlas of the Bible Magog in Turkey

The prophecy of Ezekiel 38 and 39, often referred to as the Battle of Gog and Magog, is hands-down one of the most important and influential end-time prophecies in all of Scripture. But it is also one of the most controversial and widely misunderstood prophecies.

Gog and Magog are names that appear in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), notably Ezekiel, and the Book of Revelation, sometimes indicating individuals and sometimes lands and peoples. Sometimes, but not always, they are connected with the end times, and the passages from the Book of Ezekiel and Revelation in particular have attracted attention for this reason. From ancient times to the late Middle Ages, Gog and Magog were identified with Eurasian nomads such as the Khazars, Huns and Mongols and were conflated with various other legends concerning Alexander the Great, the Amazons, Red Jews, and the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, and became the subject of much fanciful literature. They appear in the Qur’an as Yajuj and Majuj, and the Muslim world identified them first with Turkic tribes from Central Asia and later with the Mongols. In modern times they remain associated with apocalyptic thinking, especially in the United States and the Muslim world.

As one nomadic people followed another on the Eurasian steppes, so the identification of Gog and Magog shifted. In the 9th and 10th centuries these kingdoms were identified by some with the lands of the Khazars, a Turkic people who had converted to Judaism and whose empire dominated Central Asia–the 9th-century monk Christian of Stavelot referred to Gazari, said of the Khazars that they were “living in the lands of Gog and Magog” and noted that they were “circumcised and observing all [the laws of] Judaism. Arab traveler ibn Fadlan also reported of this belief, writing around 921 he recorded that “Some hold the opinion that Gog and Magog are the Khazars.” According to the famous Khazar Correspondence (c. 960), King Joseph of Khazaria claimed that his people were the descendants of “Kozar”, the seventh son of Togarmah.

The early Muslim traditions were summarised by al-Qazwini (d. 1283) in a popular work saying: “They scratch at their wall each day until they almost break through, and each night God restores it, but when they do break through they will be so numerous that “their vanguard is in Syria and their rear in Khorasan.”

When Yajuj an Majuj were identified with real peoples it was the Turks, who threatened Baghdad and northern Iran; later, when the Mongols destroyed Baghdad in 1258, it was they who were Gog and Magog.

Modern apocalypticism
In Europe expectations of the end-times have receded with the advance of a secular worldview during the 19th century. This has not been the case in the U.S., where a 2002 poll indicated that 59% of Americans believed the events predicted in the Book of Revelation would come to pass.

Considering geographical knowledge in Ezekiel’s time (during the Babylonian Exile), the northern most land of that day would be placed in Asia Minor or Anatolia-today known as Turkey-an Islamic nation, and one rediscovering its Islamist roots, thanks to Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The only conclusion can be that Gog and Magog is Turkey.

The New Moody Atlas of the Bible p. 93 places Magog in Turkey.

The Zondervan Atlas of the Bible p. 83 places Magog in Turkey.

The Holman Bible Atlas p. 36 places Magog in Turkey.

The IVP Atlas of Bible History p. 18 also places Magog in Turkey.

Most conservative, trained scholars of the Bible use what is called the historical-grammatical method of interpretation. This is to say that they simply identify the names found within Ezekiel’s prophecy according to how Ezekiel himself would have understood them. Thus in the late seventh and early sixth century B.C. when Ezekiel prophesied, Magog, Meshech and Tubal were known to have dwelt in Asia Minor, or modern-day Turkey.

The only conclusion can be that Gog and Magog is Turkey.

The Turkification of Anatolia

Anatolia

Anatolia

Anatolia (called Turkey since only 1923) has been inhabited since the paleolithic age, including various ancient Anatolian civilizations, Aeolian, Dorian and Ionian Greeks, Thracians, Armenians and Persians. After Alexander the Great’s conquest, the area was Hellenized, a process which continued under the Roman Empire and its transition into the Byzantine Empire.

The Seljuk Turks began migrating into the area in the 11th century, starting the process of Turkification, which was greatly accelerated by the Seljuk victory over the Byzantines at the Battle of Manzikert in 1071.

The Seljuk Sultanate of Rûm ruled Anatolia until the Mongol invasion in 1243, upon which it disintegrated into several small Turkish beyliks.
Starting from the late 13th century, the Ottomans united Anatolia and created an empire encompassing much of Southeastern Europe, Western Asia and North Africa, becoming a major power in Eurasia and Africa during the early modern period. The empire reached the peak of its power between the 15th and 17th centuries, especially during the 1520–66 reign of Suleiman the Magnificent.

After the second Ottoman siege of Vienna in 1683 and the end of the Great Turkish War in 1699, the Ottoman Empire entered a long period of decline. The Tanzimat reforms of the 19th century, which aimed to modernize the Ottoman state, proved to be inadequate in most fields, and failed to stop the dissolution of the empire.

The Ottoman Empire entered World War I (1914–18) on the side of the Central Powers and was ultimately defeated. During the war, major atrocities were committed by the Ottoman government against its Armenian, Assyrian and Pontic Greek citizens. Following the war, the huge conglomeration of territories and peoples that formerly comprised the Ottoman Empire was divided into several new states.

Mustafa Kemal Ali Rıza (Atatürk)

Mustafa Kemal Ali Rıza (Atatürk)

The” Turkish” War of Independence (1919–22), initiated by Mustafa Kemal Ali Rıza (Atatürk) and his colleagues in Anatolia, resulted in the establishment of the modern Republic of Turkey in 1923, with Atatürk as its first president. Since that time te rule of Turks over all other indigenous Anatolians peoples became enforced by the new state of the Turks, who became considered and treated as minorities.

Only during the past century Turkey has been “Turkified” by state power. This was done by the removal of the non-Muslim elements, first, and then by the assimilation of the non-Turkish Muslims into “Turkishness”.

Erdogan Using NATO and USA for Private Business

Turks regimes

Turks regimes

Even if the downed Russian Sukhoi Su-24M bomber aircraft by Turkish Air Force were way inside Turkey the common sense says that it was not an act of aggression or a security threat to Turkey. All the stolen Syrian oil, and terrorist oil trucks goes to Turkey and sold in Turkey, plus human organs, stolen Syrian products, and historic artifacts, to buy NATO weapons from Turkey. But Turkey’s F-16 that downed the Russian bomber was in Syrian airspace for 40 seconds, and before that it was waiting to assault any Russian military aircraft. The downing of Russian jet over Syria is stab in the back NOT by terrorist accomplices, as leader Putin said. It was downed by the terrorist regime of Turks in Turkey.

Why the Turks shot down the Russian Sukhoi Su-24M? Simply because Russia has been carrying out an aerial campaign against the Islamic State jihadist group in Syria since late September at the request of Damascus. The downing was a revenge for the destruction of oil smuggling business that belongs to Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s son. Moscow has repeatedly called on the UN Security Council to take extra steps to determine who was buying oil from the militants.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Recep Tayyip Erdogan

“Turks” does not mean” Turkey”. Since the Turks are submissive and the majority of them are supporting their long bloody history of Masonic leadership then all the Turks and not any of the other nations within turkey are considered evil.

“Turks” does not mean” Turkey”

“Turks” does not mean” Turkey”

Any evil government represents the evil in its nation; there is no evil government without a sick nation. To all the so-called good Turks: You either fight against the evil in your nation that brought such evil governments and made evil history or abandon your nation if they are sick beyond your capacity. Any evil government represents the evil in its nation; there is no evil government without a sick nation. Erdogan and his group in the ruling APK did not come from vacuum they represent the old deep sickness in Turkey.

Erdogan and APK did not come from vacuum

Erdogan and APK did not come from vacuum

Since the Turks are submissive and the majority of them are supporting their long bloody history of Masonic leadership then all the Turks and not any of the other nations within turkey are considered evil

No nation remains sick forever. And no nation or government is perfect. The health of any government and nation must be measured by a total of large number of social, economic, political and cultural indicators not a single or few indexes. We must look at the bigger present and history. Nations dies after they become very sick and corrupt. The Turks must know that they were sick and corrupt for a very long time and ask your neighboring countries and other ethnic groups “please do not label them as minorities”.

Look at the map and history of Turkey

Look at the map and history of Turkey

Look at the map and history of Turkey and its surrounding countries; the enemies of Turkey are all of them plus the Armenians; the Kurds and all other non-Turks in Turkey itself. This proves that Turkey is a rouge state.
Extremists war in Syria is actually a wicked war waged by the Turks, NOT Turkey, against Syria. The Turks must pay for war damages and the stolen oil and all other loot.

Turkey is a rouge state

Turkey is a rouge state

Erdogan and his son, and Arab gulf colleagues all of them DO NOT believe in any god or faith. They are only after their own personal interests. Caliphate and all other lies are only covers. Together with the Rothschild; Bushs and others, they are top members of secret societies; that is the New World Order NWO. Russia since the Romanovs and any other sovereign state are considered major obstacles and targets to NWO. Erdogan and his son, and Arab colleagues, all support anybody who can be hired and makes profits for this gang and they are manipulating NATO and USA cold war with Russia and Iran
The world must be clear and decisive, agents of secret societies including the Zionists, the Turks and NATO are testing the nerves of leader Putin and the solidarity and the strength of Russia and the free world. The world needs a very active and powerful BRICKS Block led by Russia and China to stand against the agents of secret societies that includes the NATO; EU; USA; Zionists; bankers & the hijacked UN.
Russia, China; India; Brazil; South Africa, and Iran, and all other free nations are bigger than all secret societies and their puppets such as NATO and the USA and their minors and associates.

Meet The Man Who Funds ISIS: Bilal Erdogan, The Son Of Turkey’s President

Bilal Erdogan

Bilal Erdogan

Necmettin Bilal Erdogan, commonly known as Bilal Erdogan (born 23 April 1980) is the third child of Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the current President of Turkey.

After graduating from Kartal Imam Hatip High School in 1999, Bilal Erdogan moved to the US for undergraduate education. He also earned a Master’s Degree in John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in 2004. After graduation, he served in the World Bank as intern for a while. He returned Turkey in 2006 and started to his business life. Bilal Erdogan is one of the three equal shareholders of “BMZ Group Denizcilik “, a marine transportation corporation.
In the next few days, we will present a full breakdown of Bilal’s various business ventures, starting with his BMZ Group which is the name implicated most often in the smuggling of illegal Iraqi and Islamic State through to the western supply chain, but for now here is a brief, if very disturbing snapshot, of both father and son Erdogan by F. William Engdahl, one which should make everyone ask whether the son of Turkey’s president (and thus, the father) is the silent mastermind who has been responsible for converting millions of barrels of Syrian Oil into hundreds of millions of dollars of Islamic State revenue.

Erdogan’s Dirty Dangerous ISIS Games

Ankara's oil business with ISIS

Ankara’s oil business with ISIS

Ankara’s oil business with ISIS
Moscow has accused Turkey of helping Islamic State in the illegal oil trade which helps finance the terrorist group. According to analysts, Russian airstrikes in Syria are disrupting the profitable deals for Turkish middlemen, including Ankara officials.
Turkish social media has posted photos of Turkish President Recep Erdogan’s son Necmettin Bilal having dinner in an Istanbul restaurant with an alleged ISIS leader, who it is claimed participated in massacres in Syria’s Homs and Rojava, the Kurdish name for Syrian Kurdistan or Western Kurdistan.
There is speculation Bilal Erdogan is directly involved in the black market oil business with Islamic State.

Erdogan Downed Su-24 to Revenge Son’s Disrupted Oil Business – Damascus

Erdogan Family Business

Erdogan Family Business

Turkey shot down Russia’s bomber as revenge for the destruction of oil smuggling business that belongs to Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s son, a Syrian minister stated

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov Address

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has addressed journalists following the downing of the Russian Su-24 jet by an air-to-air missile launched from a Turkish F-16. On 25.11.2015:

~ New Turkish FM expressed regret over downing Russian Su-24 jet.
~ Evidence Turkey pre-planned shooting of Su-24.
~ Turkey warned of new response but data shows Su-24 was in Syria.
~ Lavrov calls Erdogan out on previous ‘brief invasion of airspace’ excuse.
~ Russia will re-assess bilateral ties with Turkey in light of attack on Su-24.
~ Russia not going to war with Turkey but have Q’s for leadership.
~ Russia tried to respect Turkey’s interests, to call for more balance from Ankara.
~ Moscow made no negative official stmts on Turkey, sought bilateral solutions .
~ We don’t want to target Turkish manufacturers or Russian companies.
~ Russia cannot ignore Turkish aggression. Info Ankara security supports terror.
~ Not revenge or hot-headed, Russian response to Turkey based on analysis.
~ There are 28 NATO members; we’ve got sources, Russian info of hot debate at closed-door meeting on Turkey.
~ Russia won’t shy away from contact – today’s telephone call with Turkish FM evidence of that.
~ US-led anti-ISIS coalition members using US weapons require permission to engage.
~ ISIS, Al-Nusra & other terrorists all named in Vienna accord, legit targets.
~ US supports Kurds, Turkey says they’re terrorists. It’s complicated.
~ Until armistice & Syria terrorist list is agreed we can’t move Vienna process forward.
~ Greek foreign minister called Lavrov, expressed solidarity with Russia. Mentioned 1,500 yearly Greek airspace violations by turkey.
~ All evidence says Turkey planned shooting down Su-24. Incident was well prepared ambush.
~ Oil and war booty sold, organ trafficking also noted in Turkey terrorist safe-zones.
~ Lavrov: Moscow ready to help Hollande get Syria-Turkey border closed to stop fueling militants.